The Canon Extender 2x II II is almost as sharp as the main lens. If you would like your review to be posted, please make sure that there is enough valuable information for others to read. The real difference between the two lenses is the image stabilization. The 2x series was introduced in 1987, and updated in 2001 with the version II model, the subject of this review. For some unknown reason, when I stack both this 1.4x II and 2x II extenders, the camera reads two, not three stops, aperture change, and only 2x, not 2.8x, focal length increase. Works well with 400 F2.8 IS though I had to try out 3 different examples of the convertor to get one to work well with my lens. With a 1.4x extender and the lens set to 400mm, I could resolve about 20 lines per inch, with the 2x I could get up to about 25 lines per inch when mounted on a tripod. Autofocus Operation The extender can be combined with the 1.4x Extender for a significant increase in focal length, but at the cost of significant reduction in light-gathering ability: you would lose three stops of light for an additional 240% in focal length, making your 200mm ƒ/2.8 lens the equivalent of a 480mm ƒ/8 lens. With the Extender attached, sharpness is noticeably reduced. If that is still outside your budget you might consider the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II. Se manualen för Canon Extender EF 2x II helt gratis här nedan. We reviewed the Canon 400mm ƒ/5.6L USM back in 2008, which makes a good candidate for comparison with the 200mm ƒ/2.8L USM and 2x Extender attached. Mouse over to Zoom-Click to enlarge. > Your email address will not be published. Your email address will not be published. SLRgear Review For the ''VFA'' target (the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource), we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. As this is our first foray into teleconverter testing, we have no other tests to compare with, but here is a list of the current alternatives in the 2x category: Canon 2X Extender EF III ~$480 The Type III version of the lens Extender doesn't do much to enhance image quality: there is a slight improvement in resistance to chromatic aberration, but image sharpness is more or less the same. The EF 2x II doubles the focal length of any lens it\'s mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops. That's the good news - the bad news is the 2x decreases/narrows your lens' aperture setting by 2 stops. Subscribe! In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/16, but at ƒ/8 and ƒ/11, they're almost identical. For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). For about the same price as the Canon EF 2X III you can buy an EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS. You'll never get tack-sharp results with the 2x II Extender attached: at f/5.6, the lens produced images of only moderate sharpness, with some improvement stopped down. Forget using this 2x convertor with an 'L' zoom though the results are abysmal, this convertor really demands a top lens for it to work properly - NO zoom can meet this requirement. The Canon EF 2x II Extender mounts between the compatible lens and body, and multiplies the focal length settings of your lens by 2. The finish of the lens is white, to match Canon's upper-tier L-class telephoto lenses, for which the lens is designed to be paired. Of course to get great results, you must understand the best ways to use an extender. Thoughroughly recommended. In terms of sharpness, the two are quite similar: the 400mm is slightly better at Æ/5.6 and Æ/16, but at Æ/8 and Æ/11, they're almost identical. We'd like to thank LensRentals.com for their loan of this extender for our testing: to rent this lens, click here. I was in the Serengeti with the f4 100-400 without the teleconverter, and I can tell you that I wish I had more reach. Unlike the original 6D, the Mark II will give you some use with f/8 combinations in the same was as the 80D. Canon 2x EF Extender II vs. III . Image not available. Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter #766. The teleconverters (TC) will multiply the focal length of any EF lens used with them by either 1.4x or 2x. Like! Canon lens extenders were designed in the era of film, making them fully compatible with full-frame, APS-H and APS-C EOS digital cameras. We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens. ISO 800. The image quality of this extender is extremely good and maintains the image quality of the lens that is attached to. The Canon EF 2X II telephoto extender is a reasonably inexpensive way to double the focal length of some of the Canon lenses. We used Canon's 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM telephoto lens to test the 2x II Extender, comparing the sharpness of the lens with and without the extender attached. The trade-off to the doubly extended range is the loss of two stops of light-gathering ability of the lens: accordingly, an ƒ/2.8 lens will operate as a ƒ/5.6 lens. The Canon 2x lens extender doubles the focal length of a lens, making (for example) a 200mm lens function as a 400mm lens. I wonder how the new RF mount 100-500mm performsâ¦ Canon 100-400 II + 1.4x Extender â Example 1 With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain â¦ Conclusion Lens Description: This extender has been re-designed optically and offers excellent performance with compatible EF lenses (same as the Extender EF 1.4x II). Also, please do not forget to give a star ranking to the reviewed product. Den här manualen tillhör kategorin och har betygsatts av 1 personer med ett genomsnitt på 6.7. Presuming you're using a top super tele ( 300/2.8 , 400/2.8 , 500/4 , 600/4 and 800/5.6 specifically), the results should be excellent. Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 75% when using the 2x Extender. Tips for Photographing the Great Conjunction. Shading (''Vignetting'') I have both the 2x II and 2x III. As appropriate, we shoot these with both full-frame and sub-frame bodies, at a range of focal lengths, and at both maximum aperture and ƒ/8. With the EF 2x II, AF is possible with any EOS body if the lens has an f/2.8 or faster maximum aperture, and compatible Image Stabilization lenses maintain the IS feature when used with any current EOS camera. http://www.hitendrasinkar.com/index.php?x=browse&category=30&pagenum=1. Thank you! This manual comes under the category Lenses and has been rated by 1 people with an average of a 7.5. At the time of writing this answer (December 2016), I donât own the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, nor the Canon EF 2x extender, so I had to do a bit of research. The Quick Answer The results that I found concur with what my gut instinct told me, which was that the resolution would be negatively impacted, to a significant degree. When Canon announced two new Teleconverters (Extenders) to replace the 1.4 and 2x EF Extender IIs I was skeptical that there would be an improvement in image quality over the older MkII models. in â¦ and whem stacked with a 1.4X convertor the results at 1120mm F8, ain't shabby either:-)) Obvious impact on image quality on multi-element lenses like the 70-200 2.8 is, but probably not as big an issue with the super teles. At f/45 and especially f/64, things get pretty fuzzy. A 2X extender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. The 2x extender was more useful than the 1.4x extender. Sharpness In its own right, the 2x is a good optic: there is some impact on overall sharpness and chromatic aberration, mixed with a favorable impact on distortion, but otherwise, overall image quality is still very good. Two or three word reviews will be deleted. I'm not a professional photographer, but I have shot extensively with all the gear you're discussing--and I've been on safari. 4. $185.77. In our usage of the 2x II Extender, we noticed a significant impact on the autofocus performance of the 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM lens, which is fast and snappy all on its own. About the Canon Extender EF 2x II View the manual for the Canon Extender EF 2x II here, for free. Distortion Every lens will perform differently on this extender. Designed to extend a lenses focal length by a factor of 2x, the Canon Extender EF 2X III delivers optical performance on par with the finest Canon super telephoto lenses. Without the extender, the lens shows very good results at ƒ/2.8, becoming almost tack-sharp at ƒ/4 through to ƒ/11. Macro Write your own user review for this lens. User Review Policy: All user reviews are moderated. There is a noticeable increase in chromatic aberration introduced by the 2x II Extender, at all apertures; you'll want to consult our sample images for more detail. Images at f/8, f/11 and f/16 show essentially the same level of sharpness, good but not great, and then things soften up again as the lens is stopped down to f/32 or smaller. This review will sound very similar to the Canon 1.4x Extender Review, but the 2x function is basically the same. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. It delivers seamless communication among camera body, lens and extender, and features coatings to â¦ $125.00 0 bids + shipping . You would get the benefit of better optical quality and the f/4 to f/5.6 aperture range. This way the extended front element of this 1.4x will poke into the recess in the rear of the 2x extender. Canon Extender EF 2X II in Classifieds: For Sale. The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color. Since the day one its been attached to the 300/2.8L IS & I am completely satisfied. The design of the lens is quite simple, 7 lens elements in 5 groups, and there is only one control surface on the extender: a switch to release an attached lens. Free shipping . The range of Canon 1.4x and 2x lens extenders. Both available models of the hardware, the Canon 2x extender II and the Canon 2x extender III, are compatible with the same set of lenses, so there wont be any fussing over specifics regardless of the model youre interested in. To avoid space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows. When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a factor of either 1.4x or 2x, at the cost of decreasing the lens' aperture by 1 or 2 stops respectively. Picture Information. The 200mm ƒ/2.8L offers light barrel distortion in the corners and overall, very light pincushion distortion: adding the 2x II Extender actually alleviates any problems of distortion, producing almost no distortion throughout the image. October 6, 2011by Andrew Alexander. That would cost you only one stop, making your lenses a much more manageable f/5.6. > Exposure determined by experience and luck and confirmed as near-perfect by RawDigger: 1/2000 sec. I am using the 7D mark II, I want to use the 2x extender more often but the 7D mark II how is the AF speed and â¦ This image was created on 27 November 2020 at Fort DeSoto Park. More info about teleconverters at http://sdp.io/TCWhich is better? at f/10 (wide open!) The EF 2x II doubles the focal length of any lens it\'s mounted to, and reduces its effective aperture by two stops. PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels. Imaging Resource © 1998 - 2021. Features a new seven-element design, and same weather-resistant design and anti-reflection internal construction as the new EF 1.4x II. The 2x II Extender, while technically superceded by the newer version III Extender, is still available now, for around $320. Didn't care for the quality, I compared shoots to enlarging in Photoshop and it does minimally better but not by much, I tried 3 different examples before finding one that worked well with my lens, well built, nice way to get extra length when traveling, reviewed March 7th, 2007 Build Quality and Handling I used the handheld Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM lens with the Canon Extender RF 1.4x (at 700mm) and the highly touted 45MP Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Digital camera body. http://hitendrasinkar.com/index.php?showimage=171 However, Canon warns that there is an impact on autofocus performance with type II and III Extenders. A Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens mounted over a â¦ The 2x Extender has some useful implications in macro work, offering an extra 100% magnification without sacrificing the minimum close-focusing distance; in the case of the 200mm ƒ/2.8L II USM, this results in 0.32x magnification instead of 0.16x magnification. 3. Canon 2x Extender EF Teleconverter Lens MKI . You can check the quality here Canon extender : 1.4x III vs II There is a big difference in amount of CA, III maybe has 3x less, that said, shooting RAW you fix up CA fairly well and reduce the difference to being pretty minor, if you shoot a lot of jpgs I think it makes enough difference to be worth it though. Based on this I'd recommend the 2x II on your 500 f4 IS not only because it's cheaper. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Z6 II vs Z7 II – which one is better for enthusiast. There are a few pro's and con's when considering going this route. Still it does give you much more reach at a modest cost, so you will probably have a love-hate relationship with it! Z6ii vs. Z7ii which has better tonal gradation? So, a 300mm lens beomes a 420mm with a 1.4x TC and a 600mm lens with a 2x TC. This is a topic that has been covered extensively in my ultimate guide to extenders/teleconverters. My 2x II copy must've been a good one because I can't see any appreciable difference in IQ vs. the 2x III. (purchased for $250). Using the 2x II Extender alleviates corner shading noticed without the use of the extender, at the ƒ/2.8 setting, but that's only because the ƒ/2.8 aperture is no longer available. I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. Chromatic Aberration The Canon 1.4x II Extender is heavy for its size, at just under 8 ounces, suggesting a fair amount of metal in its construction. bought and sold this one within a few months. Den här manualen är tillgänglig på följande språk: Svenska, Engelsk. At the widest setting of ƒ/5.6, the corners are only a 1/4 stop darker than the center. Use either an original version or -II version 2x extender. The Canon 2x II Extender is heavy for its size, at just over 9 ounces, suggesting a fair amount of metal in its construction. I am in between the options of a choosing a lens, Canon 500mm or Canon 400mm DO IS II, many people tell donât go for the DO lens as its not sharp. Well worth the effort though since I now have a 800mm f5.6 IS lens which gives great results. The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon.These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. Required fields are marked *. (purchased for $299), reviewed January 1st, 2007 However, the big improvements are enhancements to autofocus speed and accuracy, as well as the addition of weather-resistant seals. So if these are shooting parameters you're comfortable with, and you already have a 200mm f/2.8L, you can probably get the Extender instead of the 400mm lens. Opens image gallery.